The I. Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice, which is responsible among other things for trademark law, has ruled that apps for mobile devices such as smartphones [...]
Learn moreThe burden of proof in the case of disputed payment orders in online banking
The XI Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice, which is responsible for banking law, ruled on January 26, 2015, that Section 675w Sentence 3 of the German Civil Code [...]
Learn moreNetflix, Amazon Prime and Co. to be accessible throughout Europe
The EU Commission has prepared a proposal for a new EU regulation for adoption by the EU Parliament and the European Council. As [...]
Learn moreMobile phone providers may not refer customers to third party providers
At the end of november 2015, the Potsdam Regional Court upheld a lawsuit filed by the Hamburg consumer advice center, which sued a mobile communications provider for [...].
Learn moreInvitation emails from Facebook were unfair advertising (spam)
The I. Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH), which is responsible, among other things, for competition law, ruled on 14.01.2016 that the use of the function [...]
Learn more"No-Reply" confirmation emails with advertising add-ons are inadmissible
The VIth Civil Senate, which is responsible, among other things, for the law of torts. Civil Senate has ruled that against the declared will of a [...]
Learn more